Why not put the language banning government use of funds for abortion directly in the health care bill?
November 8th, 2010
Why leave it as a setup for courts to possibly set aside an executive order?
Obama promised an executive order banning abortion funding by government and particularly through any use of this health care plan. Why promise it after the fact? Why not put it in the package up front?
They have no plans to honor this promise on a long term. They want to boil you in water, but they are starting at room temperature so you don’t notice….
Do you really believe anything that barry promises? Come on, he is a liar, he lies to get his way. He is a spoiled brat.
Because it’s political suicide. Pregnancy that arises as a result of consensual sex should NEVER be paid for by insurance carriers or government funding. (unless the pregnancy causes a life threatening situation for the mother, or the baby will be still born) Beyond that, deal with it, or put it up for adoption.
Obama made a promise? And someone believes him after all the promises he broke after he got elected? How foolish. This shows how stupid Democrats really are.
read the bill, it is.